What should our kids learn at school
BySome suggestions on what our kids should really learn at school. The recession is not only show casing the failure of the economic systems but also the failure of the educational programs at learning institutions.
How are 11 million Americans going to find jobs, when there are no jobs to be had? The big buzz on the internet via social media traffic is all about how to find another job. What is the advice to job seekers when the employment market has radically changed?
I was watching Fred Wilson talk about disruptive industries. He made a good point about education going through a major change. So many more kids are being schooled at home. Parents are realising that the educational system is not serving their children.
That decision, whether to school a child at home or not, is not something I would want to argue about. It’s a personal decision. The only question I have is whether the parents who have lived through an educational system that has not kept up with the times will be any better in understanding what their children need to cope with in a changing world.
There are two main elements to this current problem. The first one is that there are dwindling job numbers and these will not be resurrected. As an example, the auto industry is shedding jobs on their assembly lines. That is people who have been trained to bolt a mirror onto a car will not get a job like this again.
The auto industry is going to shrink. There is no doubt. The consumer is not going to buy a new car every year. Those days are over. Thousands of jobs on assembly lines will be lost forever. What will happen to the people who used to do those jobs? And there are many more examples of this.
In other words, the jobs that provide people with low skilled work are shrinking. What that means is that kids who were neglected by the formal school system will not have work.
The second element is that the educational system is focused on bringing out academic high achievers. That is, the focus is on educating young people ready for University or College.
Those that can’t cope with this are left to drop out and do some basic courses in vocational colleges. With other words you achieve high academic honours or go and do hair dressing. The system is geared towards ten percent of the population.
What would I suggest for a school curriculum? Reading, writing and speaking your home language. Reading, writing and speaking a world language such as English, if this is not your home language. And reading, writing and speaking one other world language such as Mandarin.
Number skills which includes the most important element of how to balance your bank account! Many courses on world cultures, traditions, religions, gender issues and how to accept and respect each others differences. Many years of training on this. Our world is shrinking. We need to teach young people how to deal with it.
Business skills such as sales, marketing, advertising and financial skills. Teach them about politics, how to look after the environment and other elements that will allow them to become good citizens.
Everything about computers, how to fix them, how to program them and as basic as how to type. The most important tool in the world right now is totally neglected in the school syllabus.
Knowing how to use Windows is not enough. Young people must learn how to set up blogs, interact on social media and how to look after themselves on the internet. Include mobile phone skills in this. In fact have one module that discusses new technology and software as it happens.
Creative thinking and how to tackle problems and hurdles that life throws at you. Back to some of those subject they taught in the classical times. How to think through moral issues and learning some ethics. Bring back Plato!
So where do traditional subjects like Geography, History, Maths, Physics etc fit into this model? There’s no harm in adding some kind of academic stream to a school system at a much later stage.
But we don’t need the entire school system to focus on teaching young people these subject There are a tiny percentage of kids who have the aptitude to become scientists. Why does everybody else have to suffer through the same curriculum?
Will all this general knowledge be lost then? Of course not. It’s available at a click of the button on the internet. Why do we need to spend years on drumming it into young people’s head when they can find the information in seconds? Teach them where to look. That’s all that’s required.
It would require a huge rethink of the education system. It’s beyond the capabilities of the existing educational authorities who are focused on seemingly wanting to improve the current offering. Regrettably, that’s not where the focus should be.
What to do and suggest? Maybe parents could take over a bit of that function again. Teach your kids how to think creatively and to problem solve. Encourage them to learn another language. Teach computer skills at home and provide them with moral and ethical codes.
That could be something!














10 Comments
June 13th, 2009 at 10:05 am
I was reading, the other day, that technology doubles every 3 years. So if you send a kid to University for a technical degree, by the time they graduate, everything that they learned the first year will be out of date.
Hard to imagine the best solution on what to teach kids.
June 13th, 2009 at 10:09 am
@Richard
That’s of course also a very valid point. But then the Universities are peopled by stodgy old professors who can’t move from their highly specialised field. When I did my MBA our IT Professor got the students to run the course because he was just not as clued up as the people working. We ended up having the head of IT at Toyota present the whole year’s class to us.
June 13th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Comment left by DavidBlyth:
Anja, once again you applied your mind admirably! Destructive innovation has reared its head again, as with the industrial revolution. At work we are particularly concerned with the disappearance of artisans - the average age of these in SA is about 55 yrs - thus in about five years, we’ll see a diminishing ability to produce and maintain physical artifacts. Most people want to become managers and not do physical work! Hone-schooling is a reaction to the deterioration of educational standards. What remains to be established however, is what should a school-leaver’s competencies be? Academic/intellectual training is essential for society - what we need to avoid is the typical MBA “profit and growth above all else” approach
June 13th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
I see that Barack Obama wants everyone to learn a foreign language, but which one should it be?
The British learn French, the Australians study Japanese, and the Americans prefer Spanish. Yet this leaves Mandarin Chinese. Hindi and Arabic out of the equation.
I agree it’s time to move forward and teach a common neutral non-national language, in all countries, in all schools, worldwide?
An interesting video can be seen at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8837438938991452670.
A glimpse of Esperanto can be seen at http://www.lernu.net
June 13th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
@Brian
Thanks for your comment. There were such great hopes for Esperanto. I don’t think it will ever take. Too many prima donnas who can’t stand back to allow another language rather than theirs be the universal one.
June 18th, 2009 at 5:09 am
I think esperanto is a dead language, is it?
June 18th, 2009 at 7:32 am
NedReck says via StumbleUpon message:
Ok, I was not trying to evade this posting. It is such a hard question. You have mentioned quite important points in this posting. Yes, it is probably essential for kids to know more about the real world waiting for them, my elementary school years contained so much indoctrination, perhaps they still do for many, “Our country is the best in the world” etc. But how do we know what the world will look like 20 years from now? Will the present computer enhanced world continue or will some major event send us back some 30, 40 years..We need both to get equipped to master our world as it is today, but we also need not to bury more basic knowledge. We might need the robust steam locomotives again, God forbid, but who knows what kind of events lie ahead. A solare eruption a couple of centuries ago caused nothing worse than northern lights visible almost to the equator and telegraphs going haywire. If that should happen today, or tomorrow, we are likely to face a disaster, since we so carelessly have adopted computer power with no solid backup anywhere. Etc, etc..Maybe I’m a pessimist…:)
June 22nd, 2009 at 8:26 am
A lecturer at a teachers training college was once invited to speak at a church youth group. He began by asking them how they would define intelligence. After they had produced various definitions, he gave his: What you do when you don’t know what to do.
The kids then discussed all their complaints about their schools, and he intervened now and again, and in the end said that they should set their own educational goals. What did they want to learn, and how could they milk the system for that, even if the system was broken, and what they couldn’t get from the system, they should try to find elsewhere.
June 22nd, 2009 at 8:49 am
@Steve
That’s a pretty good way of approaching it as well. Only applicable for older kids of course. But still worth promoting.
July 13th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
About this questions of the need to learn a foreign language, it’s all a matter of what goal one may have. For instance, in places like Miami, New York, Boston, it’s probably a good thing to learn Portuguese. There are lots of business going on with Brazilians, and they are really getting the mood of it. By the way, forget Esperanto. I’m Brazilian and I’ve been to the US, Germany, Portugal, Britain and Paraguay, and no one uses it for anything which might be practical.